Canadian IFRS adoption - some inconclusive evidence

What, if any, are the potential economic consequences or benefits of the Canadian IFRS adoption?

As the activities of preparing and auditing the first set of complete annual reports using international financial reporting standards (IFRS) are in full swing, it is easy to identify some costs of transitioning from Canadian GAAP to IFRS. So it is an appropriate time to ask, why are we going through this transition? Are there benefits that my company, my clients or the country as a whole might expect to realize from IFRS adoption?

Recent academic literature has examined IFRS transitions, mainly the European Union (EU) transition, which occurred in 2005, and provides evidence that some benefits have accrued to some IFRS-adopting firms. Here, these benefits are summarized, cases where the evidence to date appears to be relatively inconclusive are highlighted and some cautions about generalizing from the EU transition experience to Canada are noted.

(For more information, read the article “Inconclusive evidence” by David Godsell and Michael Welker in the January/February 2012 edition of CAmagazine online.)

Reporting Alerts on IFRS and related resources

Information on new and revised IFRS, together with CICA's Reporting Alerts are now made available on the CICA Canadian Standards in Transition website. Related resources that are targeted towards the needs of smaller public companies are also available.

Reporting Alerts provide an orientation to the standard by highlighting the significance, content and timing of the standard or regulation; summarizing key changes from any predecessor; and suggesting an action plan to follow.

Resources that provide application guidance will vary depending on the nature of the particular standard. They may include checklists, decision trees, questions and answers, and comparisons to former requirements.

Canadian GAAP at a crossroads: Which path should private companies choose: ASPE or IFRS?

In 2011, private companies will start issuing financial reports based on either Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises (ASPE), or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Although both sets of standards are derived from the existing Canadian GAAP-based CICA Handbook – which will be phased out that same year – there are distinct differences between the two financial reporting systems. Much discussion has revolved around the more demanding disclosure requirements of IFRS; however, that’s just one of many factors private companies need to consider.


The first step in making an informed decision is analysing the business, accounting and stakeholder considerations, and the impact of choosing ASPE versus IFRS. While both sets of standards enable credible financial reporting, allowing capital providers and other stakeholders to monitor the performance of the enterprise, the choice ultimately comes down to weighing the differences between the two sets of standards against the information needs of stakeholders and intermediaries. The answer will not be the same for everyone.

(For more information, visit the Deloitte website and read Canadian GAAP at a crossroads, updated in April 2011.)

CICA seminar on integrated reporting features Robert Herz

Robert Herz, the recently retired chair of the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), will be in Toronto, Canada on November 23, 2011, for a breakfast seminar organized by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). Mr. Herz will review the proposals outlined in a Discussion Paper, Towards Integrated Reporting – Communicating Value in the 21st Century, published by the International Integrated Reporting Committee (IIRC).

The IIRC was established in August 2010 by the Prince of Wales Accounting for Sustainability Project, the Global Reporting Initiative, and the International Federation of Accountants.  The IIRC brings together a cross section of representatives from the corporate, investor, accounting, securities, regulatory and standard-setting communities.

The Discussion Paper features proposals for the development of an International Integrated Reporting Framework and outlines the next steps toward its creation and adoption. The goal of integrated reporting is to provide more comprehensive and meaningful information about how an organization creates and sustains value.

(For more information, see the CICA media release on November 18, 2011.)

International Financial Reporting Standards - IASB Future Work Plan

In July 2011, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued a Request for Views, “Agenda Consultation 2011.” This paper seeks input on the IASB’s future work plan and the areas of financial reporting it proposes to give priority to over the next three years. The comment deadline is November 30, 2011.

An important part of balancing the future work plan is to understand the financial reporting needs and challenges of stakeholders. As such, Canada’s Accounting Standards Board (AcSB) encourages all Canadian stakeholders to review the Request for Views and submit comments directly to the IASB. Your views will help shape the IASB’s future agenda.

The AcSB will be responding to the IASB, as well, and is seeking the views of Canadian stakeholders to develop an informed response. The AcSB has organized a program of public consultations between mid-October and early November 2011 to help form its response, including conference calls and roundtables in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto and Montreal. More information on the IASB Agenda Consultation, and the related roundtables and conference calls, is available online.

(For an update on recent activities of Canada's Accounting Standards Board, see the FYI Newsletter October 2011.)